Exploring bi-directional and SMS messaging for communications between Public Health Agencies and their stakeholders
An article from BMC Public Health
From the findings posted in the PubMed abstract: "Five major themes emerged from synthesizing survey and interview results: 1) Regardless of situational context (emergency vs. non-urgent) and message recipient (stakeholder group), e-mail is a favored modality for receiving public health messages; 2) The decision to use bi-directional, SMS or multiple communication strategies is complex and public health agencies' need to manage messaging concerns/barriers and benefits for all parties; 3) Both public health agencies and their stakeholders share similar values/uses and concerns regarding two-way public health messaging and SMS; 4) Public health is highly trusted, thus thoughtful, effective messaging will ensure continuation of this goodwill; and 5) Information reciprocity between public health agencies and stakeholders who share their information is essential."
Study Region | United States |
Organization | University of Washington |
Issue or Problem | Increasing effectiveness of Public Health messaging |
Tech Medium | SMS |
Technology Device | Mobile phones |
mFHAST Implication | Best methods for bi-directional SMS communications between Public Health organizations and stakeholders |
More links
-
Link to original research articleMultiple communication strategies might be utilized but the choice of a specific strategy needs to balance message content (emergency vs. routine communications), delivery (one- vs. two-way), channel (SMS, email, etc.), and public health agency burden with stakeholder preferences and technical capabilities, all while mitigating the risk of message overload and disregard of important communications by recipients.