Diabetes Text-Message Self-Management Support Program (SMS4BG): A Pilot Study

An article published in the Journal of Medical Internet research (JMIR) 2015 Mar 25;3(1):e32. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3988.

Analyzed by Pratibha Kavishwar 0 3185 Article rating: No rating

From the article objective: "To determine the usability and acceptability of SMS4BG among adults with poorly controlled diabetes."

mFHAST Implication: Opportunity to improve diabetes education, management, lifestyle factors (healthy eating, exercise, and stress management) and blood glucose monitoring reminders using SMS.

Diabetes Self-Management Smartphone Application for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial

An article from JMIR: doi: 10.2196/jmir.2588

Analyzed by M'lynda Owens 0 3071 Article rating: No rating

From the article abstract:

Methods

Patients were recruited through an online type 1 diabetes support group and letters mailed to adults with type 1 diabetes throughout Australia. In a 6-month intervention, followed by a three-month follow-up, patients (n=72) were randomized to usual care (control group) or usual care and the use of a smartphone application (Glucose Buddy) with weekly text-message feedback from a Certified Diabetes Educator (intervention group). All outcome measures were collected at baseline and every three months over the study period. Patients’ glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c) were measured with a blood test and diabetes-related self-efficacy, self-care activities, and quality of life were measured with online questionnaires.

Results

The mean age of patients was 35.20 years (SD 10.43) (28 male, 44 female), 39% (28/72) were male, and patients had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes for a mean of 18.94 years (SD 9.66). Of the initial 72 patients, 53 completed the study (25 intervention, 28 control group). The intervention group significantly improved glycemic control (HbA1c) from baseline (mean 9.08%, SD 1.18) to 9-month follow-up (mean 7.80%, SD 0.75), compared to the control group (baseline: mean 8.47%, SD 0.86, follow-up: mean 8.58%, SD 1.16). No significant change over time was found in either group in relation to self-efficacy, self-care activities, and quality of life.

RSS